Comments on: Really expensive abstract art: Gerhard Ritchter

By: About abstract art | Most expensive abstract art of a living artist | yasoypintor | Contemporary and abstract art

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:13:04 +0000

[…] a previous post where I showed you some of Richter´s most stunning abstract paintings and I explained that what interests me the most is the free painting technique he uses as well some […]

By: Gerhard Richter paintings: top selling living artist | yasoypintor

Gerhard Richter paintings: top selling living artist | yasoypintor — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:24:48 +0000

[…] previous posts I´ve talked about Richter´s Abstract Paintings. What interests me the most is the free painting technique he uses as well some of the abstract […]

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Sun, 13 May 2012 13:52:16 +0000

Now I understand. Thanks for commenting. Rgds

By: Nina Dias

Nina Dias — Sun, 13 May 2012 12:14:54 +0000

Imagine the same pigments / kind of same Guts , thougts… temperament … – in a injured country , in a modest village … etc – the body of the Artist match the Time /space and it matters were he/she is

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Sun, 13 May 2012 12:08:53 +0000

What do you exactly mean Nina?

Rgds

By: Nina Dias

Nina Dias — Sun, 13 May 2012 12:07:25 +0000

IT ALL DEPENDS OF WERE YOU ARE

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Sat, 12 May 2012 22:50:27 +0000

Thanks for sharing your thoughts Frans.

Rgds

By: Frans Commelin

Frans Commelin — Sat, 12 May 2012 18:07:15 +0000

i love the works : bold and fluent.

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Fri, 11 May 2012 06:21:33 +0000

Hola Queta, en lo que respecta a la ejecución, como tú dices parece más fácil este estilo que el de los impresionistas. Pero yal y como comentas, el impacto que recibes después de observar uno de estos cuadros de Richter es probablemente más fuerte. Hablamos de dos estilos pictóricos totalmente diferentes y por lo tanto pienso que no deben compararse. Otra cosa son las preferencias de “gusto personal” y “criterios de belleza” que cada uno pueda tener sobre un estilo u otro.
Yo pienso que probablemente Richter no debía recapacitar en los primeros cuadros que hizo de esta serie, pero como artista que soy también te digo que cuando has hecho mucho de algo ya sabes “más o menos” como puede ser el resultado final. Yo pienso, y aquí ya se ha debatido, que Richter arriesgó realmente en los primeros. Si él sigue haciéndolos hoy en día, tengo mis dudas sobre si en esa acción hay riesgo.

Gracias por compartir tus ideas y enriquecer este debate.

Saludos

Antonio

By: Queta bosch

Queta bosch — Fri, 11 May 2012 05:55:55 +0000

Parece mas facil realizar este estilo de pintura que un cuadro impresionista .Esto parece un poco una explosion interior Sin tiempo a recapacitar antes de hacerlo.pero los cuadros de Richter me parecen impactantes

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Thu, 10 May 2012 20:02:22 +0000

Hello Gabriel, quite interesting your reasoning. So, according to you, most of what is being made know a days in the art scene is not adding anything and it is a reinterpretations of prevoius pionering artists. Is this right?. I sometimes ask my self the same type of questions you ask yourself. What is really valuable art?. How to make it?.
International art markets have to do with money and speculation (like any other asset class), while art issolated only in terms of artist creation is another thing. The problem I find is that the line that separates both is so thin that it is easy to mix them up.
Any way, thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts here and see you around soon.

Antonio Basso

By: GABRIEL SENCIAL

GABRIEL SENCIAL — Thu, 10 May 2012 19:08:51 +0000

To answer your first question, Richter is not adding anything to Art History.What he is doing is what a Silk-screener has been doing since the fisrt person who discovered doing a Splt fountainor Blend. which is what Richter does only on a larger scale.. Its all ABOUT MARKETING AND TIMIING.
AS I PAINTER MYSELF, WHAT I find in common with him IS HIS SENSE OF Serarch and DISCOVERY , more so in his middle career,
The Squeege paintings are his late commercial trip, I feel that once you do a number of them like I did in my days as a serigrapher, is repeating yourself…( Repeating is not Creative ),which is presicely what galleries are interested in a marketable item , nice colors,the BLENDING THATHappens in the process is Visually stimulating but a far cry fom being anything new or transcendant in the history of Painting. I saw this kind of painting back in the 60’s in New York where the craze was “happening” with artists doing this but in small sizes.

I always ask myself What transcendence will most of the ART work being passed as HiGH ART in the last 60 yeras will have in a 100 years. from now ??? Look at the financial Markets, and what happened to them, its all about Speculation, and ,… making a Fast Buck No matter what ……

Guys like Picasso, Duchamp,Dali plus many more who were pioneers, they have merit and their prices could even go much higher, but others are gallery Inflated well planned SCAMS….

GABRIEL SENCIAL

By: yasoypintor

yasoypintor — Thu, 10 May 2012 12:49:15 +0000

Hello, thanks a lot for your wide answer. I agree with you in that he takes risks. I wonder if the first painting he made of this abstract series was a rational, unconsciuos or simply a try and error execution. Anyways the resulting pieces are captivating as well as the making process. Best Regards.

Antonio

By: Ribas Velazquez

Ribas Velazquez — Wed, 09 May 2012 19:19:42 +0000

Sure. I think he adds the casuality and the possibility . A high technical painter as Richter takes a stepback and allows his canvas to take a risk and express itself. Then, he contemplates what’s happening, half viewer, half creator, analyse and determine by taking the control again in a very confident way.